Consciousness, Energy Work, and What the Research Says

This post contains affiliate links. If you purchase through any of these links, I may earn a small commission at no additional cost to you.

What this article covers: What neuroscience and psychology can honestly say about consciousness, energy work, and practices that consistently produce results despite incomplete scientific explanation — Damasio's somatic marker hypothesis, Siegel's interpersonal neurobiology, mirror neuron research (Rizzolatti), Davidson's meditation neuroscience (Wisconsin), and the current state of biofield research.

The research: Damasio, The Feeling of What Happens (1999) and Descartes' Error (1994); Siegel, The Mindful Brain (2007); Rizzolatti et al., mirror neuron research (Science, 1996); Davidson et al., "Alterations in Brain and Immune Function Produced by Mindfulness Meditation" (Psychosomatic Medicine, 2003); Chalmers, "Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness" (Journal of Consciousness Studies, 1995).

Key points: The hard problem of consciousness remains unsolved. Interpersonal nervous system resonance (mirror neurons, co-regulation) provides a plausible neurobiological mechanism for some energy work observations. The strongest evidence base in this area is for meditation and mindfulness. Practices that produce consistent internal state changes are worth using even when the mechanism is not fully explained.

The takeaway: The research neither fully validates nor fully dismisses energy work and consciousness practices. What it does is provide partial explanations for why some of them work, and a methodology for distinguishing the practices with stronger evidence from those where the evidence is thin.

The intellectually honest position on consciousness and energy work is that these are genuinely complex phenomena at the frontier of what current scientific methodology can fully investigate — and that this complexity is an argument for careful attention, not for either dismissal or uncritical acceptance.

The Hard Problem of Consciousness

David Chalmers, philosopher at New York University, named the "hard problem of consciousness" in a landmark 1995 paper in the Journal of Consciousness Studies: the question of why subjective experience exists at all. The easy problems of consciousness — explaining how the brain processes sensory information, integrates data, generates behavior — are hard in the technical sense but tractable: they are questions about mechanism, and mechanism can in principle be mapped. The hard problem is different: why is there something it feels like to be a conscious organism? Why does neural processing produce subjective experience rather than occurring "in the dark"?

This problem is not solved. The neuroscience of consciousness — the mapping of neural correlates to specific experiential states — has advanced significantly, particularly through the work of Antonio Damasio at the University of Southern California. Damasio's somatic marker hypothesis (Descartes' Error, 1994; The Feeling of What Happens, 1999) proposes that consciousness is grounded in the body's physiological states — that the brain's representation of bodily signals is the substrate on which awareness is built. Feeling, in Damasio's model, is not peripheral to consciousness; it is constitutive of it.

The practical implication: the body is not a vehicle for a consciousness that happens in the head. Consciousness is embodied. The experiences described in energy work — felt as sensation in the body, as heat, pressure, movement, tingling — are occurring in the same substrate where consciousness is generated. Whether what is described as "energy" corresponds to a specific physical phenomenon or to the body's own somatic awareness is a question the research has not definitively answered.

What Interpersonal Neurobiology Offers

Daniel Siegel's interpersonal neurobiology — developed across The Mindful Brain (2007), Mindsight (2010), and extensive clinical research — documents that the brain is a social organ. Its development, regulation, and moment-to-moment functioning occur in relationship to other nervous systems. This is not metaphor: the infant's nervous system is literally regulated by the caregiver's through co-regulation mechanisms that Siegel and Allan Schore (UCLA) have mapped at the neurological level.

The mirror neuron system, discovered by Giacomo Rizzolatti and colleagues at the University of Parma (published in Science, 1996), provides a specific mechanism: neurons that fire both when an action is performed and when the same action is observed in another. In the domain of emotional experience, the mirror system produces resonance: observing another person's emotional expression activates a similar neural pattern in the observer. The nervous system is, in a technically precise sense, resonant with the nervous systems of those it is in contact with.

What practitioners describe as "feeling someone's energy" — the experience of sensing another person's emotional or physiological state — may reflect this resonance mechanism. The experience is real (it has a neural substrate). Whether what is experienced corresponds to something transmitted from the other person, or to one's own nervous system's resonant response to observable cues, is a finer distinction than most energy work frameworks draw.

The Evidence Base for Specific Practices

Richard Davidson at the University of Wisconsin-Madison has produced some of the most rigorous research on consciousness practices and their neural effects. His 2003 study in Psychosomatic Medicine, conducted with experienced meditators trained in the Tibetan tradition, found measurable differences in brain electrical activity between experienced meditators and novices, with meditators showing more activity in left prefrontal regions associated with positive emotional states and immune function. A 2004 study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found structural differences in the neural regions associated with attention in long-term meditators.

Jon Kabat-Zinn's Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction program has produced over 700 peer-reviewed publications documenting clinical efficacy for chronic pain, anxiety, depression, psoriasis, and cardiovascular conditions — the strongest evidence base of any consciousness practice in the literature.

For energy healing practices specifically: nursing research on Therapeutic Touch and Healing Touch shows consistent patient-reported calming effects and some clinical outcomes for pain and anxiety, though methodological limitations (difficulty blinding) complicate interpretation. Acupuncture has a moderate evidence base for pain management, with plausible neurobiological mechanisms (gate control theory of pain, endorphin release). Qigong and Tai Chi have emerging evidence for balance, cardiovascular health, and psychological wellbeing.

The Epistemically Honest Position

The history of medicine includes many practices that preceded their scientific explanation: aspirin's mechanism was not understood until decades after its clinical use was established. The absence of a fully validated scientific explanation for a practice that consistently produces specific, useful results is not evidence that the practice doesn't work. It is evidence that the explanation is incomplete.

Alison Wood Brooks at Harvard Business School published research in 2016 (Journal of Experimental Psychology: General) demonstrating that personally meaningful rituals — regardless of their specific content — reliably reduce anxiety and improve performance in demanding situations. The mechanism appears to involve perceived control and focused attention rather than anything specific to the ritual's content. A practice that produces a useful internal state is worth using even when the mechanism is partially understood.

The intellectually honest approach to energy work and consciousness practices: use what consistently produces useful results. Investigate the mechanism with curiosity rather than either belief or dismissal. Notice that the practices with the strongest evidence bases (meditation, mindfulness, somatic awareness) cluster around the same territory that contemplative traditions have developed for millennia — which is less mysterious, and more interesting, than coincidence.

---

Keep reading: → The Neuroscience of Manifestation — predictive processing, dopamine expectancy, and the brain during intention practices → What Pooja Is Really Doing to Your Nervous System — the element-by-element nervous system analysis of ritual practice

This post connects to You Are the Love You Seek — on the awareness and the capacity that are already present.

Discover all my books →

Subscribe to The Elysian Press — weekly posts on psychology, healing, astrology, and building. Subscribe here →

---

References

1. Chalmers, David. "Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness." Journal of Consciousness Studies 2, no. 3 (1995): 200–219.
2. Damasio, Antonio R. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. Putnam, 1994.
3. Damasio, Antonio R. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. Harcourt, 1999.
4. Davidson, Richard J., et al. "Alterations in Brain and Immune Function Produced by Mindfulness Meditation." Psychosomatic Medicine 65, no. 4 (2003): 564–570.
5. Lutz, Antoine, Lawrence L. Greischar, Nancy B. Rawlings, Matthieu Ricard, and Richard J. Davidson. "Long-term Meditators Self-Induce High-Amplitude Gamma Synchrony During Mental Practice." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101, no. 46 (2004): 16369–16373.
6. Rizzolatti, Giacomo, Luciano Fadiga, Vittorio Gallese, and Leonardo Fogassi. "Premotor Cortex and the Recognition of Motor Actions." Cognitive Brain Research 3, no. 2 (1996): 131–141.
7. Siegel, Daniel J. The Mindful Brain: Reflection and Attunement in the Cultivation of Well-Being. W. W. Norton, 2007.
8. Brooks, Alison Wood, Juliana Schroeder, Jane L. Risen, Francesca Gino, Adam D. Galinsky, Michael I. Norton, and Maurice E. Schweitzer. "Don't Stop Believing: Rituals Improve Performance by Decreasing Anxiety." Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145, no. 3 (2016): 379–392.
9. Schore, Allan N. The Science of the Art of Psychotherapy. W. W. Norton, 2012.