Avoidant Attachment in Conflict
Conflict triggers the deactivating strategy: emotional withdrawal, minimal engagement, and stonewalling that reduce the relational intensity the system cannot tolerate.
Stonewalling — Gottman's (1994) term for emotional shutdown in conflict — produces a measurable decrease in heart rate as the avoidant individual disengages. But physiological flooding persists beneath the stillness.
Early caregivers who withdrew or punished emotional expression during conflict taught the system that disengagement is the only safe strategy. Need expressed during conflict brought rejection.
Withdrawing physically or emotionally, giving minimal responses, leaving the scene. The partner reads this as indifference; the avoidant individual is often more activated than they appear, managing through suppression.
Learning to identify internal activation during conflict and name it without acting from the impulse to withdraw. Gottman's (1994) physiological self-soothing protocol before conflict re-engagement is directly applicable.
Gottman (1994) documented stonewalling as predominantly avoidant behavior and identified it as a predictor of relational dissolution. Kobak and Sceery (1988) established that avoidant college students show more deactivating defensive responses under stress.
Continue the work
Nikita Datar's books address avoidant attachment patterns directly, with somatic and nervous-system-informed frameworks grounded in research.