Home / Answers / Self-Sabotage / Not-ChoosingSelf-Sabotage / Not-Choosing

Why Can't I Start the Thing I Want to Do?

The neuroscience of freezing at the threshold: why knowing what you want is not the problem.

You know exactly what you want to do. The knowing is not the problem. You know the email needs to be sent, the call needs to be made, the step needs to be taken, the work needs to be started. The knowing is clear and it has been clear for some time. What is not happening is the doing. The gap between the knowing and the doing is not filled with deciding or planning or the legitimate preparation that some steps require. It is filled with a quality of suspended motion: not procrastination in the sense of choosing something else instead, not avoidance in the sense of actively moving away, but a kind of stillness in which the step is neither approached nor retreated from but simply not taken, in a way that is not chosen and cannot be unchosen through the deliberate application of will. You have applied the will. The will is not the issue. The issue is in the body, in the specific physiological state the step is activating, which is the state the nervous system calls freeze.

The freeze response is the fourth of the trauma responses, the one that arrives after fight, flight, and fawn have been assessed as unavailable or insufficient. It is the dorsal vagal response: the activation of the evolutionarily oldest branch of the vagus nerve, which produces a shutdown of metabolic activity, a reduction of motor function, a dampening of the felt sense of the self as present and capable of action. In the animal kingdom, the freeze response mimics death, reducing the predator’s interest in the prey and buying time. In the human context, when the threat is assessed as overwhelming and neither confrontation nor escape nor appeasement is sufficient, the nervous system collapses into immobility. The immobility is not passive. It is the active deployment of the organism’s shutdown mechanism, the nervous system’s last available protection when all other options have been exhausted.

The specific freeze that appears at the threshold of the life that is already there is not the full dorsal vagal collapse of the overwhelmed trauma survivor. It is a partial freeze: the system is not fully shutdown but it is in a state of sufficient dorsal vagal activation to prevent the motor initiation of the desired action. The email stays in the drafts folder not because the person is avoiding it but because the step of sending it requires a level of ventral vagal engagement — the genuine social engagement that involves full presence and genuine exposure — that the partial freeze is suppressing. The business plan stays in the notebook not because the planning is incomplete but because the step of submitting it requires a quality of agency and forward motion that the partial freeze has put on hold. The freeze is the nervous system’s response to the specific threat level that the desired action activates. The threat level is the threat level of the original room’s response to the full expression of the self.

The creative freeze deserves specific attention because it is the freeze that costs the most and is the least understood. The writer who sits at the blank page and cannot begin is not failing at discipline or inspiration. They are in the freeze response, activated by the specific threat level of the creative beginning, which is the moment of maximum creative exposure: the moment before any work exists, when the self is most nakedly committed to a direction whose outcome is entirely unknown. The painter who has not touched the canvas in three weeks is in partial freeze, activated by the threshold of visibility that the next stroke represents. The entrepreneur who has the business plan and has not submitted the application is in freeze at the threshold of the commitment the submission represents. The freeze is not about the quality of the work or the viability of the idea. It is about the nervous system’s assessment of the threat level of the exposure.

Peter Levine’s somatic experiencing work describes the freeze as an interrupted action. The nervous system has mobilized the organism for action and then, at the threshold where the action would require the full exposure, has suspended the mobilization without completing the action. The suspended mobilization is stored in the body as the freeze: the held energy of the action that did not happen. The completion of the freeze requires allowing the body to complete the movement that was interrupted, often through the micro-movements and the trembling and the slow forward motion that somatic work facilitates. But the completion can also happen through the step itself. The taking of the action at the threshold completes the motor sequence the freeze was interrupting.

The step does not need to be taken without the freeze. The step can be taken while the freeze is running. The person who sends the email with the chest tight and the breath shallow is completing the freeze response through the action rather than waiting for the freeze to resolve before the action becomes possible. The freeze resolves through the action. The action is the resolution. The threshold is not the obstacle. The threshold is the location of the frozen step. And the frozen step, taken, begins to thaw the freeze. Not all at once, not permanently, not without the freeze returning at the next threshold. But the evidence accumulates: the threshold was crossed and the organism survived the crossing. The nervous system registers the survival. The freeze’s threat assessment is slightly revised. The next threshold activates slightly less freeze.

Source: From Chapter 29, “The One Who Froze at the Threshold The Life That Is Already Yours by Nikita Datar.

Read the full chapter on AmazonRead Free Preview

Related questions

See all 51 answers from the book, or read the book overview.